Please login to vote

How U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) could be different



A database of researchers' conflicts of interest could exist

Organ transplantation treatment could improve for patients

The effect of mercury, formaldehyde, aluminum, polethylene glycol, (adjuvants) etc. in vaccines could be tested for health effects / removed

Low-dose naltrexone could be used for MS, autoimmune, cancer, pain, etc.

NIH scientists / employees could not receive financial royalties / perks

Clinical trials could not end uninformatively

Anti-parasitic drugs could be useful in treating viruses

Miscarriage autopsies could determine causes / contribute to research

Stillbirths could be prevented / researched more

Crowdfunding / different funding sources could improve science and research

Vaccine manufacturers could face liability for adverse events, contribute to government compensation programs, use placebos in clinical trials, and/or have incentives for improving vaccines

The U.S. FDA's incentives for approving drugs / vaccines could change

Effective pandemic treatments could be communicated to doctors and available faster

Medical research could be scientifically valid and free from conflicts of interest

Doctors could access accurate drug data (not from sales reps) to safely / effectively prescribe drugs

Gain-of-function / biotechnology / bioweapon research laboratories with pathogenic agents could have enforced safety guidelines, be done at sea / isolated areas, or not be done

The academic / research peer review process could be improved / changed

Governments, scientists, and institutions could have transparent and online data