Prediction markets could improve future forecasts / public policy
Philanthropy could encourage policy options that are beneficial
Homelessness government spending could be more efficient, less regulated, coordinated, prioritized, and tracked
Policymaking could be open and collaborative
Public policy could be created differently
Social issues could be reframed and better communicated to create change
Public program evaluation could include comparable cost benefit analysis
Human-centered design could be used in the social sector and business
Local investigative reporting and newspapers could be funded by philanthropy / become nonprofit / have a sustainable business model
RCTs could be a marginal way to inform public policy
Behavioral economics, consumer insight research, and mystery shopping could be used in the design and delivery of public programs
Research could be communicated and organized in easy-to-read formats
Public policy ideas could be easier to access through artificial intelligence
Plain language could be used more in government, universities, and other organizations
Evidence-based policy could be evidence-informed
Social sector knowledge could be better collected, organized, and displayed
Public policy clearinghouses could be easier to use and more comprehensive
Government agencies, schools, hospitals, police, universities, foundations, prisons, workplaces, elections, judiciary systems, and nonprofits could collect, publicize, and use citizen feedback
Journalism and activism could present solutions
Votes on amendments could be done by secret ballot and votes on laws could be public and recorded
Individuals and organizations could track, oppose, or endorse legislation online
Low-cost random controlled trials could test government programs' effectiveness
